REPUTATION MANAGEMENT

Redefining honesty in a crisis: Why truth alone is not enough

By our African Marketing Confederation News Team | 2026

Honesty must be demonstrated through transparency, accountability and action – shaping both reputation and future trust following a crisis.

Man in a gray suit being interviewed by multiple reporters outdoors microphones in front of him

Image by Magnific

When an organisation suffers a cyberattack, customer data leak or faces a major public scandal, telling the truth is essential. But new research suggests it is not enough on its own: organisations also need to communicate early, treat people with respect and show how they intend to put things right.  

 

The study, led by researchers at the University of Portsmouth in the UK, identifies six principles that can help businesses communicate honestly during a crisis and rebuild relationships with the people affected. 

 

While many of these principles reflect established ideas about transparency, trust and accountability, the researchers highlight three that deserve greater attention: being proactive, communicating respectfully and focusing on solutions.  

 

Together, they point to what the researchers describe as ‘collaborative relationship building’ involving stakeholders, listening to their concerns and working towards constructive solutions, rather than simply trying to protect an organisation’s reputation. 

 

Be proactive, respectful and focus on solutions 

 

“Honesty in a crisis is about much more than making a statement or admitting that something has gone wrong. People want to know what has happened, what it means for them and what an organisation is doing to put things right. Our findings show that being proactive, respectful and focused on solutions is just as important as being transparent,” explains Dr Jason Sit of the School of Strategy, Marketing and Innovation at the university. 

 

The study also highlights the importance of treating crisis communication as a meaningful way to maintain relationships, not simply manage reputational damage.  

 

A company’s response can influence whether customers feel ignored or supported, and whether trust can be rebuilt over time. 

 

“The research could help organisations rethink how they respond when things go wrong. In the case of a cyberattack, for example, this could mean providing timely updates even when all the details are not yet known, being clear about what customers should do to protect themselves and explaining what is being done to strengthen security,” the research team states. 

 

You can find out more about the study here.